HomeOur PurposeOrder DVDContact UsBLOGElements of ConspiracyObject of ConspiracyInstructions to JuryQuestions to Jury - EventsQuestions to Jury - Defendants

Scroll down to the bottom of this page for the questions to be answered. The questions presently on this page relate to the events at the World Trade Center,the Pentagon and Shanksville. Questions regarding the Hypothetical Defendants will appear on the DEFENDANTS page as they are completed. Each Event is divided from the other. We will not begin compiling the results of these forms until they are all completed hopefully by 11/11/11. You may test them now if you like. We will not count them until all are finished.

Questions Regarding the World Trade Center Event:

Verdict


Evidence Regarding World Trade Center Questions Regarding Defendants' Conduct
Ridiculous Assertion Refuse to Verify; Investigate; Release Info Lied Implies Conspiracy
1, Initially the Defendants let the public believe a mainstream media lie, that the Twin Towers were constructed as a "hollow tube." Instead the Twin Towers consisted of a heavy A-36 (36,000 psi) steel rigid frame core with 47 box columns connected to the 14" x 14" outer box columns constructed of heat strengthened 100,000 psi columns at 3'-3" center to center. Space frame diaphragm floors connected the inner core to the outer tube with corrugated steel decks running perpendicular to the exterior. Four inch thick steel Spandrel panels 54 inches deep were welded fully to both sides of the outer wall box columns which supported floor loads to the outer columns in the impact areas. This prevented collapse. Every floor was designed to support a library load.
2. The top 32 floors of the South Tower tilted 22 degrees east over WTC-4 but never reached the ground as one piece. This rotation once begun would continue until something opposed it with an equal and opposite force of 56 million foot kips or 112 million foot pounds. This was not available and yet this 32 story section never made it to the ground. The only way this could be avoided is by the use of explosives to demolish the 32 floor section in mid air.
3. NanoThermite was found in all the dust samples taken at WTC. If the "terrorists" wired the Twin Towers with NanoThermite, why would the same terrorists bother with hijacking airliners and crash them into the WTC? Would it not be more of a blow to kill all the occupants with a surprise explosion and then take responsibility while you're in another country and save your well trained operatives for some future work? The evidence of nanothermite cutter charges found in the WTC dust samples proves without doubt that the purpose of the jets crashing into the towers were to cast blame on some innocent parties.
4. Molten Iron is a byproduct of a NanoThermite Reaction. Tons of molten iron were found in the basements of all three WTC skyscrapers six weeks after 9-11. A NanoThermite reaction does not require the addition of oxygen as the reaction produces its own oxidizer and therefore can burn in oxygen starved environments like the collapsed debris covered basements of WTC Towers 1, 2 and 3. The discovery of this molten iron was not mentioned in the NIST report and when questioned about it they denied its existence.
5. Fire fighters reached the impact area of WTC South Tower 2 and reported that there were "several pockets of fire" and that they were going to "knock them down" with "two lines." Almost immediately after this message was received the South Tower Collapsed to the ground. The South Tower had not burned as long as the North Tower. This coupled with the evidence of NanoThermite can only mean that the South Tower was pulled first to keep the Fireman from putting out the fire and saving the building and the possible discovery of the charges throughout the building by repair crews. These tapes of the firemen were withheld until August of 2002.
6. Fires in the WTC North Tower were smoldering as black smoke indicated and a woman was seen and photographed waving from the opening of the impact area showing that the fires were burned out in that area of most damage. Fires that are burned out cannot produce the initation of a global collapse as FEMA has asserted in their Performance Report. Once steel begins to cool it will not continue to weaken.
7. FEMA admitted in summary that they looked for a secondary cause to initiate global collapse because the buildings did not collapse from the jet impact or the hottest initial fires. They admitted that such an event to cause to initiate a global collapse would have to be on the order of an earthquake or high wind. Since that did not happen they settled on fire even though they also admitted that most of the jet fuel went through the building and out the other side in a huge fire ball. FEMA further admitted that fire had never brought down a modern steel framed skyscraper before.
8. FEMA has suggested in their Performance Report that the Twin Towers pancaked as a result of the upper floors collapsing down upon the lower floors. A natural pancake as a result of mere structural failure would mash all the building materials into a pile which would have both floors and supporting steel all mangled in between each consecutive floor. If the Twin Towers would have collapsed naturally as a result of structural failure the debris pile would be 27 stories high. The debris pile would have been four stories higher than the Marriott Hotel or WTC-3. But a debris pile of only two to four stories proves the use of explosives that pulverized the building components and dispersed them in a cloud that settled all over southern Manhattan.
9. The WTC Twin Towers are not structural systems that are susceptible to pancaking as "lift slab" systems are. Lift slab construction involves setting columns in place and then pouring several concrete floors all at once around the columns and then jacking the floors up one at a time and attaching them to the columns and then repeating the process. Lift slab buildings have pancaked before but even then the stacks of debris are not as neat and thin as one might expect. The Twin Towers were built to compartmentalize all damage that might occur including the accidental crash of multiple 707 jets which are of almost equal size, weight and speed of a B-767.
10. FEMA admits in their WTC Performance Report that their best guess of why WTC-7 collapsed was very unlikely: "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue."
11. 9-11 Commission Report does not mention the collapse of the 47 story WTC 7.
12. The National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) Report on WTC-7 says failure of one column due to "thermal expansion" caused global collapse. SIMPLY NOT POSSIBLE - LUDICROUS!
13. NIST finally admits that WTC-7 fell at free fall speed for at least the first 4 seconds indicating no resistance from its structural frame at all. The only explanation for that is the use of explosives to remove the supporting frame.
14. Larry Silverstein, the WTC Lease Holder, admitted on a 2002 PBS documentary entitled "America Rebuilds" that the NYC Fire Department Commander made the decision to "pull" WTC-7 after Silverstein suggested it and they watched it come down. This is impossible for the fire department to do and it is impossible to wire it in one afternoon! Therefore, WTC-7 was pre-wired for demolition while occupied and since we know that fact, there is nothing that would have prevented Larry Silverstein from having WTC Towers 1 and 2 wired for demolition as well. Why would Silverstein pre-wire WTC-7 for demolition on 9-11 and not the Twin Towers?
15. Larry Silverstein made his public admission about the fire department commander deciding to pull the 47 story WTC-7 building one year after 9/11/01 and no investigative power in America has inquired into this most alarming statement. This can only mean that there will never be a real government investigation of Larry Silverstein because they are co-conspirators.
16. Every report made by Professional Societies or Government Agencies presumed the truth of the government official story related to what happened on 9/11/01. Every report then merely reviewed the damage information that was remaining that had not been destroyed or removed from the crime scene by the government. The reports then cataloged the damage and showed how the materials were affected by the presumed event. No investigation other than those conducted by private individuals has ever looked for what might have occurred outside the government official story. This can only mean that fear prevents a real investigation of the events of 9/11/01. And that fear comes from exposing the Criminal Conspiracy between high offices in the U.S. government, Mainstream Media corporations, Silverstein Properties, Insurance Companies, American and Delta Airlines and U.S. Military Think Tanks and Public Policy Think Tanks to Commit Domestic Terrorism to alter foreign and domestic policy in the United States.

Questions Regarding the Pentagon Event:

Questions-pentagon


Evidence Regarding The Pentagon Questions Regarding Defendants' Conduct
Ridiculous Assertion Refuse to Verify; Investigate; Release Info Lied Implies Conspiracy
1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and Structural Engineering Institute (SEI) Pentagon Building Performance Report presumes the government official story and catalogs the affect of that supposed event upon the structure after government and military cleans up the site.
2. No 757 parts are found and verified at the Pentagon crash site. Aircraft parts shown in Military photographs are proven not to be parts of a B-757
3. The approaches are in dispute between eye witnesses who say the approach was from a more Northerly direction while the Government story claims a more Southerly direction. The Black Box or Flight Data Recorder FDR shows a more Northerly supporting the eye witnesses. The government cannot change their story without explaining why the light polls were knocked down in the wrong place.
4. The Exterior Obstacle Field in the government asserted path cannot be flown by a B-757. In order to clear an undamaged 304 foot high television antenna located 2400 feet or 3.1 seconds from the first light poll taken out would induce 2.36 Gs on the jet and 1.5 Gs is the computer limit for the 757 which prevents pilot error. Light poles are on the ground in photographs in the government insisted approach but those impacts should have caused the 757 more damage and in cases where only one light poll is struck jets have been known to crash immediately and leave debris in its path. Even though there was damage to a large mobile generator no jet debris was left in the yard in front of the Pentagon. The jet was also said to have struck a low in ground vent with its left engine there again is no debris in the yard. There are large cable wire spools in the yard right in front of the impact zone and they are not disturbed from their location as shown in ariel photos taken on 9/7/11.
5. The government insists that the 757 was flying at level flight across the yard only one or two feet about the lawn at 530 MPH as they insist their only photo sequence shows. The flight path is so low and level that it cannot be seen at all behind a short post in their video. This would be an impossilble manuver after crossing an freeway overpass 0.3 seconds before impact which would be at least 30 feet higher
6. Significant "Ground Effect" occures on most any aircraft when it is flying within its wingspan from the ground. The wingspan of a 757 is about 125 feet. That means that if the jet is flying under 125 feet off the ground it will be experiencing pressure pushing up from compressed air beneith it. At 530 MPH or 777 feet per second this ground effect is so strong that level flight only two feet above the ground would not be possible. Passenger Jets have lots of wing surface area designed to lift at sufficient speeds. 530 MPH is way above take off and landing speeds for a 757. At 530 MPH a 757 can either crash or fly but it cannot cruse at 2 feet level to the earth.
7. Down draft created by this ground effect will also blow cars, trucks and busses off the highway. Those that claimed the aircraft almost hit their car antenna would have complained about it also blowing them off the road and rolling over and over.
8. The Damage Profile on the face of Pentagon after impact and before collapse 20 + minutes later does not match that of a 757. The ASCE & SEI Report admits this and says that the right wing could have been broken back after hitting the large mobile generator and then followed the rest of the jet into the hole. They had the same excuse for the left wing by saying it hit the low concrete in-ground-vent stack. But they had no such explanations for the high tail section.
9. Interior Damage Pattern does not support any aircraft very well if the all damage elements are put together. A 757 could not create a hole at the location on the front wall without flying only a foot or two off the lawn. Even at that ridiculous altitude and speed it could not get beyond the wire cable spools without disturbing them. Also the center of the 757 nose would have to hit on the second floor slab which would effectively slice the 757 fuselage into two parts, upper and lower. But there is little damage at all to the columns on the second floor. The ASCE & SEI Report said the whole aircraft "slid" into the first floor. Then the hole in the A-E ring outter wall is completely round and from floor to ceiling of the first floor only. This hole is in the line of the approach the government or military personel say is on their more southerly path in line with the downed light poles. But our scale model proves that there is a forest of columns that are damaged very little if at all that are in the direct path of the presumed fuselage on the first floor from the opening in the front wall to the opening in the back wall in the A-E ring. The damage profile on the front wall supports another type of aircraft that had a smaller wingspan and a tail section that was less than half the height of a 757.
10. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) under a Freedom of Information Act Open Records Request obtained by others and reviewed by Pilots for 911 Truth reveals that the FDR or Flight Data Recorder shows that the flight deck Door was never opened. This means that the cockpit door to the jet that is said to have hit the Pentagon was never opened and no hijacking was possible without doing so. Therefore, the jet said to have hit the Pentagon did not hit the Pentagon with hijackers flying it.

Questions Regarding Shanksville Event:

Questions-shanksville


Evidence Regarding The Shanksville Questions Regarding Defendants' Conduct
Ridiculous Assertion Refuse to Verify; Investigate; Release Info Lied Implies Conspiracy
1. Mayor of Shanksville says no 757 jet parts, bodies, or evidence of a plane or jet crash was found at the crash site. Mayor says his sister and friend were the first people on the crash site and saw nothing but a 5 foot by 20 foot ditch, 6 foot deep. The Mayor says they watched as the "crash site" was excavated and nothing was found to indicate a airplane crashed there at all. The Mayor reported that he was told by the FBI that jet parts were found in the woods where nobody was allowed to go.
2. The same is said about the "crash site" of "Flight 93" in Shanksville and reported by a Fox News correspondent.